Posted: 20 Oct 2010 04:21 PM PDT
My son turned 6 this weekend, and one of the games we played at his party was the classic Simon Says. I love that game! It never ceases to amaze me how easily the kids are fooled. Even at 5 going on 6, they seem to instinctively obey verbal instructions.
It reminded me of a study just published in Psychological Science by Vikram Jaswal, at the
For example, in one study the experimenter hid a sticker under one of two cups. If the kid guessed right, she won the sticker. If the kid guessed wrong, the experimenter got it. The experimenter told the kid how much she wanted the sticker.
Then the experimenter told the kid which cup the sticker was under. Of course, she lied.
The kid, unsurprisingly, believes the experimenter – after all, the kid is just 3 years old. And then the kid is proved wrong.
The strange thing is that the kid doesn’t learn from her mistakes. She goes on believing the experimenter. And losing every time.
It seems that there’s something specially convincing about verbal testimony. When they re-ran the experiment, but with the experimenter using an arrow to point to the cup, instead of saying anything, the kids cottoned on much quicker. Well, mostly.
And when they re-ran it using either a video of the experimenter or audio, they found that the kids were more likely to keep believing the lie if they could see as well as hear the experimenter.
The researchers reckon this reveals a deep-seated, evolved trait the drives young kids to believe what they’re told.
Other research they’ve done (not yet published) shows that kids will repeatedly believe an adult’s account of an event, rather than trusting their own eyes. And other evidence seems to show that adults also are susceptible to this – although less so than 3-year olds, of course.
Jaswal VK, Croft AC, Setia AR, & Cole CA (2010). Young children have a specific, highly robust bias to trust testimony. Psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society / APS, 21 (10), 1541-7 PMID: 20855905
Posted: 20 Oct 2010 11:21 AM PDT
Government statements in parliament have confirmed that, despite massive spending cuts to public services being announced later today, large funding for ‘faith’ groups is to continue. The BHA has criticised this decision, saying there is little evidence that ‘faith’ groups in the community need continued funding from the public purse, over and above that already available to groups in the voluntary sector generally.
In an answer to a written Parliamentary question last week, Baroness Hanham, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, confirmed that they would again be funding ‘Interfaith Week’ in November and will continue with a grant scheme that is open only to groups working on ‘interfaith’ issues.
The previous government spent a huge amount of money on programmes to engage with ‘faith communities’, including millions in grant funding, plus money for ‘interfaith week,’ a national conference, strategy papers, regional funding and printed guidance for local authorities.
Pepper Harow, BHA Campaigns Officer, commented, ‘There is little evidence that faith groups within the voluntary sector are in need of specific and additional support yet the coalition government has agreed to continue the targeting of resources in this area. At a time where the voluntary and local sectors will suffer severely from budget cuts it is even more important that, where there is to be funding and support from the state, it is supported by evidence of need and is available to all groups, regardless of their religious status.’
Sri Lanka's News Portal for Secularism, Humanism, Science and Reason
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Young kids can't help believing what they're told
at 8:53 PM